点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
(新春走基层)中老铁路上演“列车春晚” 中老泰三国民众共庆“中国年”******
中新网昆明1月19日电(缪超 黄再云 张伟明)中国京剧、汉服舞、茶艺表演、写春联送福字、老挝乐曲、泰国舞蹈……19日，在时速160公里的中老铁路C272次动车上，举行了一场以“中老一家亲，祥和中国年”为主题的中老铁路“列车春晚”。
北起中国昆明，南连老挝万象，全长1035公里的中老铁路作为“一带一路”的标志性工程，开通运营一年多来，其影响已外溢到泰国、马来西亚、新加坡等诸多国家和地区，区域互联互通、共同发展的带动效应明显，沿线商贸民生受惠颇多。
图为演员与小乘客互动。 李嘉娴 摄当天的“列车春晚”于10时开始，随着《让我听懂你的语言》音乐响起，身着民族服饰的中国傣族姑娘依波逢翩翩起舞，车厢内顿时热闹起来。依波逢来自云南西双版纳傣族自治州，曾到老挝留学。回国后，她成为中老铁路列车员，“我一直在提升自己，服务好旅客，当好中老友谊的使者。”
依波逢的舞蹈刚结束，云南省京剧院的青年演员登场唱起《贵妃醉酒》选段，“海岛冰轮初转腾，见玉兔，玉兔又早东升。”含蓄婉转的唱腔，雍容华贵的扮相，赢得旅客阵阵掌声。
图为演员在列车上表演《贵妃醉酒》选段。 李嘉娴 摄“春节来临，我们将京剧这一中国国粹搬上中老铁路动车，是想让中老泰三国民众感知中华优秀传统文化的独特魅力。”云南省京剧院青年演员张雯琦说。
京剧唱罢，老挝乐曲唱响。乘坐C272次动车从昆明前往西双版纳研学的老挝籍铁道教师李灵美、陈尚德伴着悠扬的老挝乐曲，带动旅客们一同跳起老挝舞蹈。陈尚德告诉记者，“我们正在昆明铁道职业技术学院学习铁路知识，学成回国后将成为老挝铁路职业技术学院的老师，我们将为老挝培养更多铁路人才，维护好、运营好老中铁路，开发好、建设好老中铁路。”
“能在中老铁路列车上体验到中国的年味，很温馨！”泰国旅行者陈慕筠兴奋地加入到联欢互动中，现场教授旅客们泰国舞蹈，“我非常期待泰中铁路早日建成，与中老铁路连通，这样我们的国家就能更好地融入区域发展，泰中两国就有更多经济文化交流。”
图为旅客和列车员举对联合影留念。 李嘉娴 摄国之交在于民相亲，民相亲在于心相通。“中老一家亲，祥和中国年”中老铁路“列车春晚”每一个节目都为中老泰三国旅客带来特别的欢乐，车厢里不时传出一阵阵笑声。
据悉，今年春运以来，中老铁路中国段客流激增，旅客主要以探亲流、旅游流和学生流为主，中国铁路昆明局根据客流需求，精准投放运力，日均开行28对动车组列车，每天发送3.7万人次，高峰期达到35对，每天发送旅客4.4万人次，有效满足了旅客出行需求。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)